The data within every single category formed the basis for the reciprocal translation described inside the following.Records identified through database looking (n = 414)More records identified by way of other sources (n =13)Duplicates removed (n =1)Records screened (n =426)Records excluded (n =385)Full-text articles assessed for eligibility (n =41)Full-text articles excluded, with reasons (n =34)Studies included in qualitative synthesis (n = 7)Figure 1 PRISMA Flowchart of search.Mei er and Schnepp BMC Medical Informatics and Choice Generating 2014, 1454 httpwww.biomedcentral.com1472-694714Table 1 Summary of analyzed articlesAuthors Date of publication Nation Title Alexander et al. (2007) U.S.A. Clinical details systems in nursing homes an evaluation of initial Signifies we can not say whether the perceived attractiveness with the consumers implementation strategies  To discover implementation strategies, employee experiences, and elements influencing employee satisfaction Explorative 4 nursing houses, 6 months following implementation Concentrate groups (22 60 Min.) Unstructured observ.Httpwww.biomedcentral.com1472-694714Page three ofor German language, and c) utilized a qualitative design and style. To ensure that only research that fulfill research good quality criteria were integrated, only these had been selected that d) had been published inside a peer-reviewed journal. Next, all remaining articles have been study in full text and all studies excluded that did not meet the inclusion criteria. Furthermore, a manual search was carried out in the reference lists of the articles obtained. For search particulars see Figure 1. Research that referred towards the setting "hospital" were excluded. Furthermore, research have been excluded that focused on standardized methods, e.g. nursing languages or Minimum Data Set. Those research have been excluded mainly because the concentrate of such research is around the approach in lieu of on the IT program itself. This systematic overview adheres for the principles with the PRISMA statement . Accordingly, immediately after reviewing the complete text, seven articles were chosen. For particulars from the chosen articles see Table 1.Evaluation synthesisbody of qualitative evidence is largely primarily based around the work of Ammenwerth et al.  and Urquhart et al. . The authors stated that quantitative procedures could not be adequate to discover why individual wards react differently to computer-based nursing documentation.Phase 2 Deciding what's relevant to the initial interestThis next phase involves numerous choices on `what is relevant'. The rationale for search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria is presented inside the section `search approach and sample'.Phase three Reading the studiesEven Noblit and Hare  in their original work state that this phase will not be especially clear. They interpret this phase as repeated reading with extensive interest towards the particulars of each and every study. We have an understanding of this to imply that we ought to familiarize ourselves using the chosen research by reading them a lot of times, mainly in full, but also in element.Phase four Figuring out how the studies are relatedNoblit and Hare  defined a seven-step procedure for guiding a meta-ethnographic approach (Table 2).Phase 1 Getting startedAccording to Noblit Hare , `getting started' incorporates defining a analysis interest that qualitative investigation may well enlighten. In our case the motivation for synthesizing theTo identify how the research are connected Noblit and Hare advocate forming a list of key metaphors, phrases, concepts and their relation to one another and juxtapose them.